Can We Really Blame CM Punk?

By Jack Brady

News broke overnight that CM Punk has at this point of time walked away from all WWE duties. Pulled from every upcoming house show and tour it seems that Punk, real name Phil Brooks, has indeed left the WWE.  Reports suggest that Punk told Vince McMahon that he was “going home” after arriving at Monday Night Raw earlier this week.

While we’ve seen the whole Punk vs. the Authority storyline previously with him [kayfabe] quitting, this seems to be a whole different ball game. Clearly the final straw came on the weekend when, after a four year absence, Batista won the 2014 Royal Rumble Match.

Punk is one of the biggest stars in wrestling today and he knows that. Punk should undoubtedly factor into the WWE World Heavyweight Championship match at Wrestlemania XXX, yet the dirt sheets are telling us that Punk is instead in line to face Triple H– a man still trying to keep a stranglehold on his glory days.

Here we have a Championship match that is pitting two former allies up against one another – Batista, an almost 50 year-old, out-of-touch wrestler against the champion, Randy Orton.  Sadly for wrestlers like Punk and the incredibly over Daniel Bryan – old school sentiment trumps today’s stars come this time of the year.

You only have to look at the rumoured matches at Wrestlemania and alleged upcoming returns to know that this sentiment towards wrestlers of decades past is severely affecting the future of the company. Alongside Batista, Brock Lesnar, Rob Van Dam and Triple H trying to remain relevant, there are rumours rife that Hulk Hogan and Sting will be with the company in the coming weeks and that Ryback may be slated to face the Ultimate Warrior – a man who hasn’t laced up the boots since 2008 – at Wrestlemania XXX.

In today’s age of wrestling we should be seeing wrestler’s like Dolph Ziggler, Damien Sandow and Kofi Kingston soar to new heights. Not even established tag teams the Real Americans and The Usos can escape the old school sentiment at the moment given that the 40 year-old New Age Outlaws won their first Tag Team Titles in 15 years on the weekend.

So, can we really blame CM Punk for leaving?

Not at all.

Hopefully this serves as a wakeup call for the WWE.


Why the Armageddon Six Man Hell in a Cell should NEVER occur again

By Jack Brady

Rewind twelve years. December 10th, 2000. Armageddon. There took place one of most entertaining Hell in a Cell’s of all time, the first (and thus far only) six-man Hell in a Cell match. It pitted WWF Champion Kurt Angle against The Rock, Stone Cold Steve Austin, The Undertaker, Rikishi and Triple H.

There it was seen, one of the most hellacious matches in WWF/E history. We saw every man bleed. We saw Austin go through a car window, Rikishi get chokeslammed off the top of the Cell and Triple H get slingshotted into a car. It was half an hour of pure entertainment and unforgettable spots and at the end of the day we saw Kurt Angle retain his title.

In saying that, it should never happen again.

The WWF in 2000 was jam-packed full of wrestling stars. This match was a way that the world could see all of them pitted against one another at the one time. A time before the Elimination Chamber was introduced. Each of these men will be hall of famers of the company at some point in time. Steve Austin is already so.

To Hell and Back: Kurt Angle Retains the WWF Championship

This feat of a six-men Hell in a Cell should never occur again let alone be suggested to be the answer to the upcoming Hell in a Cell PPV that will be taking place on October 28th.  With John Cena seemingly out with an elbow injury past the upcoming PPV, there are rumours going around that they the company will counteract his absence with the second-ever six-man Hell in a Cell.

With the way that this past week’s RAW went down, this suggested match would more than likely see WWE Champion CM Punk take on Kofi Kingston, The Miz, R-Truth, Ryback and Alberto Del Rio.

It doesn’t even compare to the match that took place in 2000. The disparity between those in 2000 and those in today’s WWE is immense. Between Kurt Angle and co. they have won thirty-eight world championships and eighty championships overall in the company.

Fast-forward to the suggested 2012 version and only Punk, Miz and Del Rio have won world championships, only a mere eight times between them. Overall, these six current wrestlers have won only thirty-one belts. To even suggest these men try and replicate what those six legends of wrestling produced in 2000 is ridiculous. I mean, Ryback hasn’t even won a title in the company yet.

If the WWE were to reintroduce the six-man Hell in a Cell later next month, it would well and truly tarnish what Angle, Austin, Rikishi, Rock, Taker and H did in 2000. It was one of the greatest matches in WWF/E history due to its innovative originality.

It shouldn’t happen ever again.

Future Endeavoured: Children, the future of WWE

By Jack Brady

Cast your mind back to Wrestlemania 21: the night that John Cena won his first WWE championship and begun his rise as the face of WWE.

Brian Fitz, in his 2006 book “Between the Ropes” earmarked Cena to lead the WWE into the future.

“Cena is the man who will carry the company to its next great height.”

The now ten-time WWE champion has done that and then some. The man himself becoming a primary influence of the introduction of WWE’s PG era in 2008; the structure of this era now defines the production practice of WWE wrestling as the storylines, showcased on the company’s shows Raw and Smackdown, have now become a family- friendly substance.

For the WWE too have gone through the programming structures of the 90’s Attitude Era and the Early-2000’s Ruthless Aggression Era, their most recent change of programming to the more jovial PG rating was a bold and not necessarily popular move.

The PG era alienated the long time fans of wrestling as the live crowds and the global wrestling audience became divided over Cena, the face of the WWE’s PG product.
This divide is now personified through the chant “Let’s go Cena, Cena Sucks”.

According to the WWE corporate website approximately 56% of the WWE audience is made up of women and children under the age of 18, this is the audience that chants for Cena.
Vince McMahon’s change of WWE programming to PG saw that he could avoid controversial storylines and appeal to over half of the company’s audience that is women and children.

Since he had already bought out all the other major wrestling companies, McMahon realised he could centre the company more on profits and sponsors throughout the global environment especially through the company’s PG focus in terms of merchandise and the marketing of kid-friendly wrestlers like Cena, Santino Marella and CM Punk.

The resistance, the old-school fans who chant “Cena Sucks” are those that enjoyed the hardcore storylines of wrestling. This form of wrestling according to former WWE wrestler Dave Bautista was killed by Cena.

“The girls love him, he’s good looking guy, says all the right things, does all the right things, but the hardcore fans can’t stand him,” Bautista said in a 2011 interview.

“He is Mr. PG… to me; he [Cena] killed hardcore, edgy wrestling.”

The WWE’s flagship shows, Raw, introduced in 1993, and Smackdown, introduced in 1999, prior to the PG era were embroiled in controversial storylines and the older fans loved the antics of the Attitude and Ruthless Aggression Era’s: such times that were defined by the beer-drinking, finger-flipping Stone Cold Steve Austin, crowd-favourite The Rock and the emergence and dominance of Brock Lesnar.

Since the emergence of the PG Era, and as wrestling journalist Asif Lalani points out, a lot of cool things had gone away.

Essentially what the PG era and wrestling nowadays encompasses is pretty simple: no boobs, no blood, no controversy, and no swearing.

Mr Money in the Bank: Cena with the briefcase he won at last Sunday’s PPV.

Long-term fans of the company don’t have the same enjoyment from the current product of the WWE: they are bored by John Cena.

What these fans are failing to realise is that the continuance of the WWE in later years will come from the appealed audience of today, the kids.

More critically: why would McMahon kill something the kids love? They are the future of the company’s success. Many children, whom the company is targeting through its product now wouldn’t even remember the wrestling of old.

There is no need for it to change to secure the businesses global environment. The children take it a face value already and love it as it is.

It will be little Sam’s or little Zoe’s first John Cena shirt that they wore with pride in their childhood who will still be watching Raw and Smackdown in twenty years time with their own children.

These kids in the company’s global audience today are the focus of the business production practice and released mediums of today and of the future. Not the old geezers reminiscing that the WWE was better ‘back in the day’.

Sure. Wrestling isn’t edgy, isn’t as hardcore and may not even be as haphazard in its storylines as it once was. Yet what McMahon has done with his product and with his stars like Cena shows that he is appealing to the majority of the company’s global environment through the company’s expressed media.

It’s just good business.